Category: Government Contracting

CASE LAW ALERT:  Cochise Consultancy, Inc. v. United States ex re. Hunt, 2019 WL 2078086, ___ S. Ct. ___ (2019) In a unanimous opinion issued on May 19, 2019, the United States Supreme Court resolved a circuit split regarding the statute of limitations applicable to qui tam False Claims Act (“FCA”) cases in which

Read More

Federal agencies are increasing civil monetary penalties for the violation of numerous federal laws for the first time since the 1990’s.[1] Of particular concern to government contractors are recent interim final rule changes issued by the U.S. Departments of Justice (“DOJ”) and Labor (“DOL”) that have increased the maximum penalties for violation of the False

Read More

In an en banc decision filed July 7, 2015, the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s original dismissal of consolidated qui tam suits brought by whistleblowers, alleging that their former employer, Kinetic Concepts, Inc., had fraudulently claimed reimbursements from Medicare. See US ex rel. Hartpence v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc. (12-55396) and US ex rel. Godecke v. Kinetic Concepts

Read More

The auditors for the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) received additional guidance from DCAA further defining and focusing on the identification of expressly unallowable costs and the recovery of penalties for those unallowable costs. Federal contractors should consider this guidance carefully; what the DCAA instructs its auditors regarding unallowable costs will directly impact contractors

Read More

Mar 17, 2015

“Request for Payment” Link Reinforced By Recent Federal Ruling

Written by Allison L. Murphy

On January 7, 2015, a California federal judge granted an FCA defendant’s Motion to Dismiss premised on allegations that it failed to comply with Good Manufacturing Practices (“cGMPs”) regulations. See U.S. ex rel. Campie v. Gilead Sciences, Inc., No. 11-cv-00941 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2015). In this case, two former Gilead employees with quality control responsibilities

Read More

In 2014, the Ninth Circuit issued an important decision on the notion that good faith disputes and/or disputed interpretations of contract requirements should not be actionable as false claims. In Gonzalez v. Planned Parenthood, 759 F.3d 1112 (9th Cir. 2014), the relator alleged that the Medi-Cal billing manual required Planned Parenthood to bill Medi-Cal “at

Read More